falsafe molasadra
somayeh vasei; abbas javarashkian; Sayyed mortaza Hosseini shahrudi
Abstract
Knowing the truth of the material body in transcendent wisdom requires knowing the soul and consequently leading to the knowledge of the soul; But despite its importance, it has been dealt with sporadically and briefly in the works of philosophers. The present article seeks to examine in detail the truth ...
Read More
Knowing the truth of the material body in transcendent wisdom requires knowing the soul and consequently leading to the knowledge of the soul; But despite its importance, it has been dealt with sporadically and briefly in the works of philosophers. The present article seeks to examine in detail the truth of the material body according to the specific principles of Sadr al-Muta'allehin. According to the three ontological principles in transcendent wisdom, namely the originality of existence, skepticism, intensive movement, and another principle in Sadra's psychology, namely, "the soul in the unity of all forces," the existence of a human unit begins its journey from elemental matter with essential motion. It gradually reaches abstraction through the degrees of existence. This study, while examining in detail the course of matter from the abstract, explains the meaning of the material-singleness of the soul and removes two important doubts in this field, and in the end reaches the conclusion that the material dignity of the soul is combined with its abstract status. Is and the truth of the body, which is the emergence and manifestation of the powers and perfections of the soul in the form of quantitative forms; It is materially different from the soul.
falsafe molasadra
Sima Torabi Dashtbayaz; Seyyed Mortaza Hoseini Shahrudi; Alireza Kohansal
Abstract
The nature of moral propositions from the point of view of Allameh Tabatabai and the validity of the "goodness and badness" that underlie them suggest that one cannot evaluate and deduce moral propositions by using either classical logic or even mathematical multi_valued logic. The philosopher proficient ...
Read More
The nature of moral propositions from the point of view of Allameh Tabatabai and the validity of the "goodness and badness" that underlie them suggest that one cannot evaluate and deduce moral propositions by using either classical logic or even mathematical multi_valued logic. The philosopher proficient in jurisprudence believes in absoluteness in moral concepts and relativity in moral considerations. Moral propositions are constructional and follow the continuous variable of public interest and corruption. "Fuzzy Logic" or "The logic of ambiguity" provides a model of approximate arguments in human evaluations and can replace linguistic variables with numerical variables, concepts, variables, and many approximate and ambiguous systems and simulate in mathematical language. “Truth” is a linguistic variable because its values are linguistics such as true, very true, fairly true, not very true, untrue, not very true and not very untrue, etc. In this paper, based on the parametric representation of linguistic truth-values it is proved that so far, fuzzy logic has been the most perfect recognized reference in moral propositions for the purpose of achieving accurate evaluations of complex human decisions.
falsafe molasadra
Feizollah Abedini; Abbas Javareshkian; Seyed Morteza Hosseini Shahrudi
Abstract
Since one of the explicit differences between Avicenna and Mulla Sadra’s philosophical thought based on the important issue of ‘Motion’ specially ‘Substantial Motion’, and there’s complete difference in the debate, the author has tried to response the questions about ...
Read More
Since one of the explicit differences between Avicenna and Mulla Sadra’s philosophical thought based on the important issue of ‘Motion’ specially ‘Substantial Motion’, and there’s complete difference in the debate, the author has tried to response the questions about the origins and theoretical basis of this difference and to find out which position and principle have been involved in this contrast. First part of the essay studies the difference between Avicenna and Mulla Sadra‘s essential position through analytical comparison of ‘Motion Premise’ in the thought of these two well-known philosophers. 1- Sadra’s perception of motion against Avicenna’s quiddity and category centered attitude. 2- Expanding of ‘Motion’ discussion from concretes to abstracts especially human soul. 3- Change in the position of’ Motion’ from the section of natural issues to the section of common affairs. By analytical studying of the mentioned points specially with meditating in Avicenna’s objections on ‘Substantial Motion’, we conclude that the difference of these two well-known philosophers in the premise of ‘Substantial Motion’ originates from the most important philosophical position that is called ‘Principal of Existence’ or ‘Priority of quiddity. On this basis of these facts and despite of all denials and doubts of some other thinkers in Avicennas’s ‘Principle of priority of quiddity’ thought, based on this philosophical analysis , it can be explicitly seen the consideration of ‘priority of quiddity, which at least can end the doubts about ‘ Motion Premise’.
